The Value of On-Site Level 2 to Level 1 Recovery Housing
At Sunstone, offering both Level 2 and Level 1 recovery housing on the same campus creates a seamless, resident-centered continuum of care. Individuals often arrive seeking Level 2 housing with no income and a clear need for structure, accountability, and day-to-day support. As they stabilize, gain employment, and build recovery capital, the availability of on-site Level 1 housing allows them to step down naturally, without disrupting their momentum.
This model promotes long-term stability by enabling residents to remain in a familiar, substance-free environment while gaining greater independence and autonomy. It reduces housing insecurity, supports sustained recovery, and reinforces successful transitions from structured support to self-directed living. All without forcing residents to leave the very community that helped them succeed.
While direct, head-to-head studies comparing structured step-down models (e.g., Level 2 to Level 1) versus direct transitions into independent apartments are limited, there is substantial evidence supporting the broader value of transitional, recovery-focused housing.
The following research insights underscore why a tiered, step-down approach like the one offered at Sunstone enhances long-term outcomes:
Recovery housing improves outcomes and reduces recidivism/relapse risks.
A systematic review found that abstinence-based, peer-supported environments like recovery housing consistently lead to better substance use outcomes, higher employment rates, and fewer criminal charges compared to usual care or no housing supports.
Structured sober living enhances treatment retention and discharge success.
According to research published in PMC, individuals who utilized structured recovery housing during outpatient SUD treatment had increased odds of receiving a satisfactory discharge and demonstrated longer treatment engagement than those without access to this support.
Extended residence in recovery housing correlates with better outcomes.
Multiple studies, including those summarized by Ethos Recovery, indicate that stays of six months or longer in sober living environments are linked to improved abstinence, employment, and reduced arrests. Without these transitional environments, achieving similar outcomes becomes significantly more difficult.
Recovery residences support legal-system-involved individuals.
Recovery homes offer a crucial bridge for individuals reintegrating after incarceration. A study published in Springer showed that these homes can substantially reduce opioid use and recidivism by connecting residents with recovery support systems and addressing barriers to community reintegration.
Recovery housing fills the gap between treatment and independent living.
Transitional recovery residences help residents apply recovery tools in real-world settings before moving into fully independent living—an especially vulnerable period for relapse and re-incarceration. Enso Recovery emphasizes how this “bridge” helps reinforce healthy behaviors and reduces risk.
In Summary
While more research is needed to directly compare step-down models to immediate transitions into independent housing, the evidence is clear: recovery residences improve outcomes, especially when residents stay long enough to build recovery capital. From improved sobriety and employment rates to reduced legal involvement, the supportive structure of transitional housing—particularly within a tiered system—can make the difference between temporary success and lasting recovery.
Source